Wavevolution
The progressive science of Wavevolution
regards the transformation from waves to atoms
and its
correlation
to new understandings of the relation
between Space and Time.
Wavevolution extends the concept of evolution
to all forms of energy
through a process of gradual changes
that transform waves into atoms.
All elements have one electric charge, one counterpart and one
mass.
Mass-less does not exist.
Symmetry is everywhere.
Neutral elements are composites of two opposite charges
and are not elementary particles.
Wavevolution is the energy transformation opposite to nuclear
fission.
.......................
Wavevolution is also the link that was missing to science
to reveal the Creation.
The origin of the Universe is revealed even by the spark
appearing
from the friction of two cutting blades while they are being
sharpened. Try to videotape the spark appearing from those two
blades, then
watch again the same film while is being rewound and in slow
motion.
You will see the light from the spark
entering the blades and becoming part of them.
In fact, the photons of light are the "building blocks" of the
metal blades. This simple example should also be a clear
indication
to explain
how the whole mass had been formed in the Universe.
Once they have reached one critical level of energy,
lost heat
as they travel and having therefore reduced their frequencies,
waves collapse, also forming two subatomic particles with
opposite charges,
as if they were the split ends of one broken hair.
Since the Big Bang, waves continue to solidify into hydrogen
atoms
and transform their energy in different forms of mass.
The Human beings, made up of atoms, are the ultimate product
of a slow process started with transformed waves.
In Wavevolution all forms of energy constantly transform.
The same quantum of energy originally carried by any wave
becomes gradually fragmented and dispersed by the encountered
interferences.
For example, quanta of gamma rays over time
will lower their
potential to become X rays
and X rays will gradually become
ultraviolet rays
diminishing their original frequencies.
The initial quantum of energy is transformed
in different forms
through spontaneous symmetry breaking.
Wavevolution shows how the behavior in waves and atoms is
identical and how this single movement common to all energy
is comparable to One Divine Will that creates the whole
Universe.
The discovery of the existence of One Universal Law
that had one beginning about 14 billion years ago
and that was not caused by Humankind
confirms as a consequence the existence of One Creator.
New and Old Science
In spite of two findings from Einstein and Planck,
one to show the equation between atoms and energy and the
other to discover the constant between waves' frequencies and
energy, traditional science has never closed the circle.
Still today,
science does not recognize the transformation from waves to
atoms.
The bureaucracy of traditional science does not allow
the recognition of Wavevolution since its verification
does not meet some of the pre-established criteria.
The problem is from the compilation of these laws or criteria
like the “uncertainty principle” of Heisenberg
that made science incapable to deal with the concept of
simultaneity.
That is why, that antiquated system of rules
was also the cause of misleading theories.
For example, Space is not “curved”.
In Einstein's paradigm, a stone that falls on the ground
from the window of a moving train also marks one parabola in
Space. Although, this path is only apparent since the Earth is
also moving
and the Time spent by the stone to reach the ground
has also changed to some degree that imaginary vertical line.
At the Time of the initial Movement when the stone falls from
the window its potential trajectory is one perpendicular Space
that is no longer the same as the stone continues to move until
it hits the ground. If the scientist had known that the
coordinates of Space in Time are unique and unrepeatable then
all the rest would have also been "straight". That perpendicular
is straight but accounted as “curve” because of the limits
imposed to science
which make it impossible to recognize the concept of
simultaneity.
In reference to any one body, on each moment in Time,
there are
always only two coordinates in Space for one perpendicular.
And with two coordinates there is no curve.
One perpendicular is unrepeatable and never the same
because while the measure of it is repeatable and any
measurement
can be applied for different segments instead one perpendicular
marked in Time will never again have that same spatial
positioning.
The perpendicular changes in Time but Einstein believed
that the concept of Space is independent from the concept of
Time.
Another example is in the special theory of relativity
which denies all absolutes and meanings of truth.
This is in regard to Einstein's example of two beams of light
hitting one same embankment of a railroad on two Points:
Point A
and Point B.
In between the two there is also the middle point,
Point M.
If one train were to run over that track then on the train we
would
also have Point A1 on the wagon of the train right above Point A
and one other corresponding Point B1 right above Point B.
We would also have on the train Point M1 above Point M.
Einstein's theory is that as for Point M
(not moving because on the embankment)
those two beams are simultaneous and equidistant,
instead, for the passenger sitting on Point M1
and moving
towards Point B1 (and also toward Point B)
the two beams are not simultaneous because the beam in Point B1
is being approached by the moving train, therefore closer to
Point M1.
In this example, while Einstein’s concept of Time
is rigidly kept unchanged in regard to the embankment,
instead, the concept of Space is extended also to the next
moment
in Time when the traveler will move
even if in that precise instant
the traveler has not moved yet.
Since the concept of simultaneity had been put aside, Einstein
considered Time to be the same while Space instead had changed.
From Einstein's hypothesis is also reported
that energy and matter are analogous
but that energy transfers through two separate mechanisms:
particles and waves.
This erroneous division shows two forms of energy, particles and
waves, as if they were not interchangeable.
Much confusion comes from these approximations.
Recently, the concept of a particle is under new scrutiny
in light of experiments which have shown
the smallest particles to behave just like waves.
Wave particle duality is the concept that all matter and energy
exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior.
One of the effects of this theory is that photons
can be calculated to have frequency, wavelength, amplitude,
and other properties inherent in wave mechanics.
In this context,
Wavevolution fundamentally differs
from the Wave-particle
duality
in the sense that while
this last theory considers the photons
as particles behaving like waves
instead
in Wavevolution waves transform into particles.
In Wavevolution, waves and particles are interchangeable forms
and all energy transfer through one same mechanism.
In some regards,
the progress of science came to a halt since
1927
when the credibility of Quantum Mechanics
and the concept of causality were placed in doubt.
That year in Copenhagen, the scientist Heisenberg
introduced the “uncertainty principle”
and according to this it is not possible to exactly determine
at the same Time the Space and Movement of a particle.
The problem is that to obtain an exact position occupied in
Space,
for example, by an electron it takes the use of short
wavelengths
which transfer to the electron a great amount of energy
turning that electron unpredictable and uncontrollable.
Instead, to obtain a precise account of the Movement of the
electron
it takes a very small amount of light (very long wave) which
results
in a poor definition of the position in Space of that particle.
The more exact and defined is the Space of a particle
the more difficult is to know its Movement and vice versa.
Heisenberg manifested his frustration
in the inability to determine the exact position of an electron
and with his "uncertainty principle" it was then decided that
what
could not be observed with human eye it will not be part of
science.
Instead, the fact that we cannot observe the exact Space and
Movement of one electron should not imply
that the electron does not occupy one position in Space.
It is evident that our knowledge occurs
through the perception of our senses but it should be equally
evident that One World exists and It is independent from our
senses.
The philosophy of Subjectivism from Bohr, Einstein and
Heisenberg believes that when one electron or one photon is not
observed
it does not have any position and its position becomes
materialized
only as consequence of one human observation.
In the name of all science, this arrogant assumption
was sealed by those scientists since 1927 and made into a "law".
It will take one new Progressive Science
before Humankind could see the first light of a new dawn.
Always
The concept “Always” is unimaginable for us
because it is beyond our limited concept of Time.
In fact, could you possibly imagine any existence or event
that has not changed in the past, that is still happening at
present
and that will continue to exist unchanged also in the future?
Everything seems to have a beginning and an end,
with only one exception.
Only the movement of Quantum mechanics is eternal and unchanged.
This movement fragments and Always recombines all energy
according to one same criteria: symmetry.
Always is the concept of this Divine instrument (Quantum
mechanics) which connects one dimension limited by
Time, Space and Movement (the expanding Universe)
with One infinite Dimension like the infinite Void
which is exempt from these same 3 concepts.
The eternal Movement of Quantum mechanics
allows the Universe to Always expand.
The concept of “Always” transports in Time the concept of “Now”
making both concepts unreachable and ephemeral.
“Now” is already past when is thought or even pronounced.
“Now” does not exist in the present, past or future,
confirming the illusion of the trilogy of Time.
Commutalism
Democracy has its origin in Greece with the concept of “Agora”
or City where the citizens standing in the squares
voted the laws to express the will of their society.
Today it is unthinkable the use of a square for such a purpose,
instead, we have “representatives” of the people
which, through a mandate, approve and abrogate the laws
often without the knowledge of the citizens.
The difference between the original concept of Democracy
and its
current counterpart is in the direct participation,
knowledge
and expressed will of the citizens, today very marginal.
If until recently we needed to have such representatives to
legislate, today, through the Internet, we could think of a new
concept of square as a pulpit where each law could be exposed
and analyzed by all people before an electronic vote.
Commutalism is a new concept of Democracy
without politicians
which is organized through the Internet and balances
the needs of the Individual with the Respect for Equality.
In Commutalism, the citizens would vote directly
for the laws and not the politicians.
In other words, instead of voting in
hope that a politician
will respect the trust of the citizens to
pass the laws they desired,
in Commutalism the citizens
themselves
would vote directly for the laws by simply clicking
on a keyboard.
Such a form of government would eliminate the
public cost
of politicians, and most importantly, the cost of
their corruption.
Different legislative boards composed of private citizens
(each
citizen taking turn) could be appointed for various bills of
law. Each proposal could be introduced to public scrutiny via
Internet
before being subjected to the majority of the citizens
that can approve it or refuse it.
No law could be approved in
conjunction with other laws
to avoid any possible social
blackmail. Each law voted separately.
One Police body composed of a larger number of citizens
(also
taking turn) could be formed to enforce the laws
whenever asked
by the individual citizens.
Monetary funds could be allocated
for different social programs
and anybody could log in to see
balance sheets and solvency
of these funded programs.
All laws
would be subjected to periodical review since some of them could
have been approved by a limited number of people paying
more
attention when these laws were first introduced or also because
the new law is not in line with all the other laws already
approved.
When any citizen believes that a certain law is
damaging his or her
own interest a new vote would allow for a
possible change of that law.
Any citizen would have the right to
vote or not to vote
but his or her right could not be sold nor
given to anybody.
Trials now taking place in a Court House could be made public
and undergoing the judgment of those citizens taking their turn.
This system of laws could manifest for the first time
one
Democracy as it was originally intended.
In order to accomplish that, it should be established
that all
human beings have the right to enough food and potable water. We
could easily irrigate plantations that could be farmed
in some
of the many remote areas of the Planet not yet utilized.
Edible
vegetables can be farmed and produced with automated mechanisms
to be prepared, packaged and transported
until ready for their
consumption.
A program like this could be funded by a common effort from the
wealth already acquired by all populations. Once established the
quantity and the quality of all goods needed for this program,
those goods could be transported and exchanged within a network
of markets sharing the natural supplies to satisfy the existing
needs in the different locations of the Planet. This program,
created to sustain everyone, should be in constant evolution to
provide a standard of living in tune with the contemporary
wealth of its time.
All remaining goods (exceeding those allocated to satisfy the
existential needs) could instead be exchanged in a new form of
Capitalism.
New and transparent Free Market's rules will be
applied
for the trade of all superfluous goods.
In regard to the
transfer of private goods or services,
every single transaction
would have to be reported on the Net
to become visible like an
invoice made public.
Each private transaction would be taxed
and
simultaneously paid
with one same fixed percentage applied for
everyone.
In such a system,
all private properties and their
owners like also all money transactions and trades of private
property must be publicly reported on the Net.
This is to
prevent unlawful transactions and root out corruption through
the immediate confiscation of those goods
that have not been
reported.
Moreover, to reduce Greed and restore the financial equilibrium
worldwide it will be enough to eliminate the concept of
inheritance.
The private property of the people will be returned
to the State
after the death of each person to be auctioned
among all citizens.
People could spend as much as they want to
educate their children
but inheritance and donations would not
be allowed.
Therefore, some goods will be private
but earned
through real
competition and not corruption or favoritism.
Once the survival is guaranteed for everybody
there will be no
need to be tolerant with crime as we are today
when the same
crime is a consequence of our corrupted system.
In Commutalism, the right to own must be protected and
guaranteed also for those who want to work and trade their own
time
to obtain more than just the basic necessities provided by
the system.
Those people who will have contributed to the
functioning of
the social mechanism and worked to have more than
what is guaranteed
will also be able to obtain superfluous
goods.
These goods could be placed in a State auction
(as if
they were the Treasure bonds of a Country)
for a bidding
reserved among those
who can dispose of means of exchange gained
through work.
Once the goods become privatized they could be
exchanged among
the citizens in a market which will be then
transparent and competitive.
Perception
If one straight line were to be seen from both sides
it would already
appear to be different.
Just like on a moving train, the
passengers who are sitting
next to opposite windows will
experience different scenarios
during the same journey. Life
itself is also comparable to a moving train.
The past
interactions determine our perceptions
in regard to what is in
front of us now.
Every thought corresponds to a specific alignment of neurons
within our brain in a way that is unique
and defines only that
particular thought.
This occurs like a firework that is always
reproduced
in the same way
by one singular arrangement of
neurons
and by their electric shocks
(called "action potential")
simultaneously lit inside our brain.
One day we will be able to decode the mechanism that triggers
the various neuronal arrangements taking place inside our brain
and we will also be able to artificially duplicate them
with
their particular set of sparks.
For example, when we are hungry,
if we were to observe
the behavior of the neurons we would see
how these “little soldiers" position within our brain in the
same manner
each time we feel the need to eat.
As in a labyrinth where every door opens many other doors,
every
thought originates from a preceding thought
which is also linked
to a precise number of other thoughts.
For example, from the
thought of a fish we could think of a sea view,
or a seafood
dinner or even a movie with sharks
but the following thought
would always be associated with it.
Although the thoughts we have during our life are not all
directly linked, all thoughts are connected indirectly by a far
reaching network. Theoretically if we were to go back
indefinitely to the origin
of the preceding thought we could
remember our first life experience.
Once we are confronted with similar situations we
recall the memory
of that particular neuron alignment that
produces chemicals,
gives orders to the muscles and determines our actions
without any thinking process.
In its function, our mind is always influenced
by the preceding thought and from that particular chemical
balance that has produced it.
Such balance leads our perception
and influences our mind in the next thinking process.
For
example, if we had just experienced an emotionally
distressed
situation we would then start our next thinking process
from a
group of neurons already positioned within our brain
and leaning
toward a certain behavior.
The neurons, pre-positioned from past
thoughts,
elaborate the ongoing events
while they are already in
a certain chemical balance, or a certain mood, that will
contribute to one given perception for the current experience.
Our perceptions are therefore always influenced from past
experiences and from one preceding chemical state of mind.
All big surprises create a shock because
of the immediate
incapability
of the neurons to organize and position.
In case of
a shock,
we often notice the consequent “dropped jaw”
from the
incapability of the neurons to align in any order
therefore
resulting in the total relaxation of the facial muscles.
The moment that more than any other will modify our perceptions
is when we believe we are about to die.
Each time we experience
extreme situations we will be led
to evaluations that will
drastically change our perceptions.
|